I watched Transformers: The Last Knight and I didn’t like it. 2/5
–
Transformers: The Last Knight, the fifth entry in Michael Bay‘s blockbuster franchise, attempts to expand the mythology of the Transformers while delivering the explosive action sequences fans have come to expect. Unfortunately, the film proves to be a disjointed and convoluted affair, struggling to find its footing amidst a barrage of complex plot threads and overwhelming spectacle.
Visually, The Last Knight maintains the series’ tradition of delivering jaw-dropping special effects. The CGI work is undeniably impressive, with the Transformers rendered in exquisite detail and seamlessly integrated into the live-action sequences. The action sequences are a testament to Michael Bay’s directorial flair, featuring his trademark frenetic camera work and a barrage of explosions. From the chaotic battle scenes to the awe-inspiring set pieces, the film doesn’t shy away from delivering the visual spectacle that has become synonymous with the franchise.
However, where The Last Knight falters is in its narrative execution. The plot is a labyrinth of subplots, ancient prophecies, and conflicting allegiances that often feel like they’re competing for screen time. The film attempts to weave together historical events, Arthurian legend, and Transformer mythology, resulting in a narrative that is more convoluted than compelling. This complexity frequently overshadows character development, leaving audiences struggling to emotionally invest in the story.
Mark Wahlberg returns as Cade Yeager, and while he brings his signature charisma to the role, the character’s evolution feels forced. Cade’s transition from a humble inventor to a battle-hardened hero lacks the organic development needed to make it resonate. Additionally, the dynamic between Cade and the Transformers feels somewhat stagnant, as the emotional connections established in previous films fail to evolve significantly.
The supporting cast, including Laura Haddock as Vivian Wembley and Anthony Hopkins as Sir Edmund Burton, do their best with the material provided. Haddock brings a level of intelligence and independence to her character, but she often finds herself relegated to the role of a plot device. Hopkins injects a touch of gravitas into the proceedings, delivering exposition-heavy dialogue with his trademark theatricality. However, even his presence can’t fully compensate for the film’s narrative shortcomings.
One of The Last Knight’s most significant missteps is its treatment of female characters. While the film introduces potentially compelling roles, including a historian played by Haddock, their agency and depth are often sacrificed in favor of advancing the male-driven narrative. This oversight is particularly noticeable in a modern blockbuster and represents a missed opportunity to provide more meaningful representation.
In conclusion, Transformers: The Last Knight is a visual extravaganza that delivers on the franchise’s reputation for spectacular action and stunning visual effects. However, its convoluted and disjointed narrative, combined with underdeveloped characters and missed opportunities for depth, ultimately hinder its potential. While fans of the franchise may find moments of enjoyment, the film falls short of achieving the emotional resonance and narrative coherence needed to elevate it beyond a mere spectacle. It stands as a misstep in a series that had the potential for so much more.