I watched The Woman in Black and I didn’t like it. 2/5
–
The Woman in Black attempts to bring Susan Hill’s chilling novel to the big screen, but falls short of capturing the true essence of the source material. Directed by James Watkins, the film stars Daniel Radcliffe in a departure from his iconic role as Harry Potter. While it boasts atmospheric cinematography and a few genuinely eerie moments, the overall execution leaves much to be desired.
One of the film’s notable strengths is its atmospheric setting. The isolated and desolate Eel Marsh House, shrouded in perpetual mist, serves as a haunting backdrop for the unfolding events. The production design effectively conveys a sense of foreboding, emphasizing the eerie isolation that permeates the house and its surroundings. The use of practical effects and minimal CGI adds to the authenticity of the setting, creating a palpable sense of dread.
Daniel Radcliffe’s performance as Arthur Kipps showcases his commitment to shedding his child-star image. His portrayal of the grief-stricken and determined lawyer is earnest, if not entirely convincing. Radcliffe conveys a sense of vulnerability and inner turmoil, but at times struggles to fully immerse himself in the role. While his efforts are commendable, there are moments when his performance feels slightly detached from the gravity of the situation.
The film excels in building suspense through carefully constructed sequences. Watkins employs a slow-burn approach, allowing tension to simmer beneath the surface before unleashing moments of genuine fright. The use of sound design and silence is particularly effective in creating an atmosphere of unease. These elements work in tandem to elicit genuine jolts of fear from the audience, especially in scenes involving the eponymous Woman in Black.
However, where The Woman in Black falters is in its narrative execution. The screenplay, penned by Jane Goldman, struggles to capture the complexity and depth of the source material. While the novel delves into themes of loss, grief, and the supernatural, the film often reduces these elements to mere plot devices. Character development is limited, leaving the supporting cast feeling underutilized and one-dimensional. As a result, the emotional stakes are not as high as they could be, and viewers may find it challenging to become fully invested in the outcome.
The film’s reliance on jump scares, while effective in eliciting momentary fright, becomes somewhat predictable over time. The scares often feel formulaic, following a familiar rhythm that diminishes their impact. Additionally, the climax of the film may leave some viewers wanting for a more satisfying resolution, as it veers towards the conventional rather than taking a riskier narrative path.
In conclusion, The Woman in Black offers moments of genuine suspense and atmospheric horror, but ultimately falls short of realizing the full potential of its source material. Daniel Radcliffe’s committed performance and the film’s haunting setting are highlights, but they are not enough to fully compensate for the shortcomings in character development and narrative execution. While it provides some thrills, this adaptation of Susan Hill’s novel ultimately leaves a lingering sense of missed opportunity.