I watched Sleepwalkers and I didn’t like it. 2.5/5
–
Stephen King‘s Sleepwalkers (1992), directed by Mick Garris, ventures into a realm of the supernatural, offering a unique premise that combines elements of horror, fantasy, and dark comedy. While the film exhibits moments of creativity and imagination, it ultimately struggles to find a cohesive identity, resulting in a mixed cinematic experience.
The film introduces us to the Sleepwalkers, a mysterious mother-son duo who are not what they seem. This ancient, shape-shifting species feeds on the life force of virginal females, a premise that sets the stage for a supernatural showdown. Brian Krause and Alice Krige, playing Charles and Mary Brady respectively, deliver performances that oscillate between menacing and campy. Krause brings a brooding intensity to Charles, while Krige embraces the eccentricity of her character, exuding a mix of seduction and malevolence.
One of the film’s strengths lies in its practical effects and makeup. The transformations of the Sleepwalkers are executed with impressive detail, showcasing the creativity of the special effects team. The grotesque and eerie appearances of these creatures add a layer of visceral horror to the narrative, effectively tapping into our primal fears of the unknown.
However, Sleepwalkers stumbles in its attempts to balance horror with campiness. The film veers into moments of unintentional humor, undermining the tension and atmosphere it tries to build. Certain scenes, particularly those involving feline aversion, border on the absurd, detracting from the overall impact of the film. This tonal inconsistency may leave viewers unsure of how to approach the material.
Mädchen Amick, portraying Tanya Robertson, provides a breath of fresh air with her spirited performance. As the film’s moral compass, Amick injects a sense of relatability and humanity into the narrative. Her character’s arc, from a typical high school girl to a courageous force against the Sleepwalkers, adds depth to the otherwise formulaic storyline.
The film’s pacing is another area that warrants scrutiny. Sleepwalkers struggles to maintain a consistent rhythm, resulting in moments of narrative inertia. The plot occasionally meanders, and certain subplots feel underdeveloped, leaving viewers craving more depth and context.
In terms of visual aesthetics, Garris creates a small-town atmosphere that exudes a sense of quiet malevolence. The quaint streets and dimly lit interiors serve as a backdrop for the supernatural events that unfold. The use of shadow and lighting effectively enhances the film’s ominous tone, creating an environment where danger lurks around every corner.
In conclusion, Sleepwalkers (1992) is a film that grapples with its own identity. While it boasts moments of creativity and effective practical effects, it struggles to find a consistent tone, vacillating between horror and camp. The performances, particularly by Krause and Krige, contribute to the film’s eerie atmosphere, but occasional missteps in execution hinder its overall impact. Sleepwalkers may appeal to fans of unconventional horror, but its uneven execution prevents it from reaching its full potential.