I watched Halloween (1978) and I liked it. 3/5
–
John Carpenter’s “Halloween” is an iconic film that forever altered the landscape of horror cinema. Released in 1978, it remains a cornerstone of the slasher genre, setting a template for countless imitations. While its cultural and historical significance is undeniable, viewed through a contemporary lens, some aspects may appear dated. This review seeks to analyze the enduring strengths and minor shortcomings of this horror masterpiece.
“Halloween” introduced and popularized several tropes that have become ingrained in the slasher genre. The relentless, masked killer, the “final girl” archetype, and the sinister small-town setting were all honed to near perfection here. Michael Myers, portrayed with eerie stoicism by Nick Castle, emerged as a cinematic boogeyman, his presence chillingly palpable. Carpenter’s impeccable direction and his iconic score, with its haunting piano melody, created an atmosphere of inescapable dread.
Jamie Lee Curtis‘s portrayal of Laurie Strode, the resilient and resourceful protagonist, established her as a seminal figure in horror cinema. Her performance offers a compelling counterpoint to the film’s unrelenting terror, providing a humanizing element amidst the chaos. The supporting cast, while serviceable, often serves as mere fodder for Michael Myers’s inexorable pursuit, a testament to the film’s adherence to genre conventions.
Beyond its visceral scares, “Halloween” delves into the realm of psychological horror. The blurred line between sanity and madness, exemplified by Michael Myers’s enigmatic silence and methodical violence, imbues the film with a deeper, more lingering unease. Carpenter’s use of point-of-view shots, particularly those from the killer’s perspective, places the audience in an uncomfortably voyeuristic position, intensifying the sense of violation.
While “Halloween” excels in building suspense, its pacing may feel measured by contemporary standards. The deliberate, tension-building sequences are punctuated by moments of visceral terror, but some viewers accustomed to more rapid horror fare may find the film’s cadence occasionally languorous. Additionally, character development beyond Laurie Strode is minimal, leaving peripheral figures under explored and relegated to the sidelines.
Viewed through a contemporary lens, “Halloween” prompts reflection on its portrayal of gender dynamics. While Laurie Strode’s resourcefulness and resilience are laudable, the film also incorporates elements of the “final girl” trope, wherein female characters often endure violence as a form of empowerment. This narrative choice, a product of its time, may warrant critical consideration in a modern context.
“Halloween” remains a cultural touchstone, its influence reverberating through subsequent generations of horror filmmakers. Its legacy is evident in the countless imitations, homages, and reboots it has spawned. The film’s indelible mark on the horror genre is a testament to its enduring power to terrify and captivate audiences.
In summation, “Halloween” (1978) stands as a landmark achievement in horror cinema. Its pioneering contributions to the slasher genre, psychological horror, and suspense-building techniques are undeniable. While certain elements may appear dated or formulaic when viewed through a contemporary lens, its cultural significance and enduring impact on the genre are beyond dispute. “Halloween” remains an essential viewing experience for any aficionado of horror cinema, a testament to the enduring power of John Carpenter’s masterwork.