I watched Swiss Army Man and I didn’t like it.
–
Swiss Army Man, directed by Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert and released in 2016, is a bizarre and polarizing film that attempts to blend comedy, drama, and surrealism into a unique cinematic experience. While the film’s concept is undeniably original, its execution falls short, resulting in a disjointed and often uncomfortable viewing experience that fails to resonate with its audience.
The film centers around the peculiar friendship between Hank (played by Paul Dano) and a flatulent corpse named Manny (played by Daniel Radcliffe). While the premise may sound intriguing and unconventional, the film’s reliance on scatological humor and shock value becomes tiresome and juvenile after a short while. The repeated use of bodily functions as a source of humor detracts from the potential depth and emotional resonance the film could have explored.
Despite the committed performances by Dano and Radcliffe, their characters lack depth and development. Hank’s motivation and backstory are only superficially explored, leaving the audience with little to invest in emotionally. Manny, on the other hand, remains a one-dimensional character, serving mainly as a vessel for crude humor rather than a compelling presence in the narrative.
The film’s narrative structure is disorienting, jumping between surreal dream sequences, flashbacks, and present-day events. While this approach may be intended to mirror Hank’s fractured mental state, it instead adds to the confusion and disconnect the audience feels. The lack of a cohesive and engaging plot further exacerbates the film’s issues, making it difficult to stay invested in the story.
Visually, Swiss Army Man has its moments of creativity, with striking cinematography that captures the natural beauty of the film’s settings. However, the film’s reliance on shock value and its attempt to be quirky often overshadow its visual strengths. The constant focus on Manny’s flatulence and other bodily functions becomes grating and distracts from any visual or artistic merit the film might possess.
Furthermore, Swiss Army Man struggles to find a consistent tone. It veers between absurdist comedy and introspective drama, but fails to strike a balance between the two. The film’s attempts to explore themes of loneliness, connection, and the human condition are overshadowed by its insistence on shock value and crude humor. The tonal inconsistencies make it difficult to fully engage with the film’s intended emotional impact.
Perhaps the most significant flaw of Swiss Army Man is its failure to deliver a satisfying and meaningful conclusion. The film builds up to a climactic moment that should tie together the film’s themes and character arcs. However, the resolution feels contrived and unsatisfying, leaving the audience with a sense of disappointment and confusion.
In conclusion, Swiss Army Man is a film that is ultimately hindered by its reliance on shock value, juvenile humor, and a disjointed narrative. While it may be applauded for its originality and boldness, it falls short in delivering a cohesive and engaging viewing experience. Despite committed performances and moments of visual creativity, the film’s flaws overshadow its potential. With its lack of depth, inconsistent tone, and unsatisfying conclusion, Swiss Army Man earns a disappointing 2 out of 5 rating. It is a film that may have its niche audience, but it fails to resonate with a wider viewership.